Sayyid Abdul Aziz Al-Hakim, leader of the SCIRI party recently arrived in London for a short visit after coming back from talks with the US President in Washington DC. He came over to the Al-Khoei Foundation just before midday for a reception and to give a short talk. Some of the previous (Iraqi) visitors to the Foundation include former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, his right hand man Sayyid Iyad Jamul Al-Deen MP, former IGC President Adnan Pachachi, former Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi, Vice President Adel Abdul Mehdi and also the President, Jalal Talabani.
Al-Hakim didn't arrive alone, he came with Shiekh Humam Hamoodi, a high ranking SCIRI member who was also the head of the constitution drafting panel which came up with the charter that was ratified on 15th October 2005. A few other high ranking SCIRI members were also present. Some who live here in London, and others who have come from Iraq. Including SCIRI's spokesman Ali Al-Bayati, who is also an advisor to the Iraqi Embassy.
After spending 5-10 minutes inside the Secretary General's (Sayyid Abdul Sahib Al-Khoei) office for small talk, he sat at the head of the hall next to the Ambassador of Iraq, Salah Al-Shiekhly and other SCIRI members. After a formal welcome message from the SG, Al-Hakim spoke briefly about the pain and suffering the Iraqi people are going through on a day to day basis and then due to a very tight schedule (he is off to Iraq tomorrow) he had to leave to go to the Imam Ali Foundation, Sayyid Sistani's office in London, which is just a few blocks down the road, for lunch.
After he left, Shiekh Humam Al-Hamoodi, stayed behind to take questions from a few Iraqi ex-pats (and journalists). There were very interesting questions asked and the answers were even better, or shall we say, more interesting. Regarding the ongoing violence in Iraq, he stated that since the fall of the Saddam regime till about Febuary 2006, the Shia were relatively (and i think even he used that term loosely) calm when it came to retaliating against "Salafi, Takfeeri and Saddamists" attacks. Mainly because Sayyid Sistani was quoted as saying "Even if half the Shia are killed, we will not take Iraq into a civil war". Sheikh Al-Hamoodi quoted Sayyid Sistani in a meeting he had with him. Apparently, Sayyid Sistani told him that "The Sunni's are not just our brothers, they are ourselves". After the Samarra Shrine was destroyed on 22nd Feb, "even Sayyid Sistani could not hold back the angry Shia" who wanted revenge. Even then, he said, there is a big difference between Shia attacks and the terrorists who "want to destroy Iraq". While the terrorists "randomly attack" the Shia, the Shia only target the ones "responsible for the heinous crimes against the innocent Shia".
He said "the more we progress politically, the more violence we see" which is a dilemma for the Iraqi government. "We were facing massive amounts of violence prior to the formation of the government, so we made sure to include all sects and blocs in the government to form a national unity government, but all we saw in return, was a step up in the attacks and more bloodshed".
Its not all doom and gloom for Iraq though. "If you look at the news bar strips at the bottom of some of the channels nowadays, you can see that the number of dead have began to slightly decrease". Good news eh?
People who wanted to ask questions normally stood up and asked them, but one person, and i promise it wasn't me, wrote down on a piece of paper and passed it to the chair asking "What do you have to say about Iranian involvement in Iraqi politics?". The Sheikh responded, without dropping a beat "The Iranians have absolutely no involvement in Iraqi politics".
After the Q&A was over, as everyone was leaving, I managed to stop one of the SCIRI leaders (who i cannot name) at the door and asked him a very simple question. "When will Iraq see the end of militias...I mean all militias...Mehdi Army, Badr Brigade (SCIRI's armed wing)...all of them? Roughly how many years?". He answered my question by asking me a question, "So you are saying all of Iraq's problems are because of the militias?". I replied "No i didnt say that, all i asked was how many years do you think the militias will exist in this new Iraq?". The answer wasnt exactly an answer. He said "The tone of your voice and the way you asked the question seem to me that you are implying the militias are responsible for all of Iraq's problem". Only after repeating myself for the third time, and short of dropping on my knees begging him to answer the actual question, did he give me an answer. "The stronger the Iraqi army becomes, and the quicker its trained and equiped, the weaker the militias will become...I'd say 1 or 2 years...maybe abit longer for the Sadrists".
Later at night, Al-Hakim gave a lengthy speech at the Islamic Center of England (Shia mosque funded by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatullah Khamenai) infront of around 500 Iraqi's. Outside the mosque, there was a small demonstration of around 15 people. 3-5 were Iraqi ba'athists and the rest were Palestinians. They were shouting slogans such as "Hakim leave Iraq alone, the people dont want you", "Murderer", "son of muta", "Ayatullah sandal (Iraqi insult)" and "Killer of Palestinians". Their chants were drowned out by the dozens of SCIRI supporters dancing and shouting "Ali is with you" as Hakim left the mosque and got into his car. Police were there making sure things dont get out of hand, but at the end they did. It was after Al-Hakim left. The fight, believe it or not, wasnt between the ba'athists/Palestinians and Iraqi Shia, but between the Shia themselves. A handful of Sadr supporters provoked the SCIRI supporters and one of them even joined the ba'athists demo. The police had to break-up a punch up and atleast half a dozen police cars/vans with sirens blazing came to the scene to disperse the crowd. The ironic part was that I was trying to explain to a police officer why the ba'athist and Palestinians who support Saddam had turned up and in the end they turned out to be the peaceful ones.