The provincial election results seem for the most part to be a vote of confidence for Maliki who managed to defeat Hakim in all the provinces previously controlled by SIIC. Maliki managed to gain Basra from the Fadheela party and also Maysan from the Sadrists.
Strangely though Kerbala, the only province Maliki's party had previously controlled was lost to Yusif Haboobi, an independent candidate, but Maliki is not going to worry too much about losing a province when he just gained 9 others.
Throughout 2008 I heard from many people who had simply had enough of SIIC and their direction, policy and attitude. Many of those I spoke to predicted that Hakim would lose a few provinces but no one predicted that this would happen. The results came as a complete shock to everyone in Iraq, not least to members of SIIC and the Hakim family.
The most embarrassing defeat for SIIC seems to be Najaf, Hakim's birthplace and what was once his power base in the south. This defeat is not only shocking because Najaf has always been historically linked with the Hakim family but because Najaf was one of the few cities in Iraq where the provincial government actually provided many services for the people.
The reconstruction of Najaf by Governor As'ad Abu Gilal and his Deputy Hassan Abdan (both members of SIIC) was used as a model by the other provinces because Najaf set the bar at a higher standard. New roads, schools, hospitals, bridges and even an International Airport are just some of things accomplished by the local government.
Last summer when I was coming back to Najaf from Rifa'i, a city in Dhi Qar, I asked the taxi driver whether or not we had reached Najaf and he said, in a depressing tone "Well can't you tell? Look at the roads and pavements. Of course we're in Najaf". The progress in Najaf both in terms of security and infrastructure was clear for all to see and drivers who pass by or stop in Najaf always complain about the state in their cities. So for people of Najaf to vote for Maliki instead of Hakim is a bold statement. No doubt SIIC members have been asking themselves where it all went wrong every since the initial results were published.
Parties in Iraq tried to use some very desperate measures in order to gain votes. These tactics could very well have worked 4 years ago but now the average Iraqi who receives a blanket or radiator from a political party just a week before the elections starts to question this act of charity. He or she will wonder why they did not receive this blanket last winter, or the winter before that.
Al-Forat used classic propaganda tricks to fool the public into thinking they will be the winners. A few days before election day they were broadcasting sample polls from across southern Iraq indicating that SIIC had around 50% of the votes in many of the cities. These attempts, as well as Hakim's sectarian "Ya Hussain" campaign proved to be futile.
There is a clear sign of maturity of the electorate and the success of these elections should be a lesson to all the politicians in Iraq. If these results are anything to go by then the next general elections could be a turning point in Iraq's history. The people will no longer vote for a party because it is more "Shia" or "Sunni" than another. The people want security, water and electricity (for now) and the politicians better listen up good or they will meet the same end every Governor in Iraq is about to face.
12 comments:
the fact maliki won hardly any votes in anbar, mosul and salahuddin seem to indicate the Iraqi electorate still vote along sectarian lines
the word is that allawi/isci/kurds are planning to table a vote of no confidence in maliki in the parliament
Anon what I meant was that the Shia between themselves do not seem to care how "Shia" the party is, SIIC tried to portray themselves as the vanguard of the Shia faith, using religious slogans in their campaigns but the people did not buy it. In Anbar the tribes and sahwa both beat the main Sunni bloc. In Salahudeen Allawi, a Shia, almost equalled Tawafuq. These are good signs.
Ahmed the only reason for that is because Maliki has become a strong figure in Iraq. Too strong for their comfort.
Politics aside, the fact that huge numbers turned out to cast their votes without a single report of violence means the country is definitely going in the right direction.
If I could change one thing about the elections though, I'd enforce very stringent campaigning guidelines.. reference to religion.. sizes of posters.. party funding.. give it time, man.. we're gonna fix the place. :)
the other surprise in Najaf was that the present governor did not run for re-election, to sum that resulted SIIC losing, but maybe, people just hated the debuty.
Akhi Hayder and everyone else, I am looking for a link to the final election results by province. Could one of you help?
Did the neo Baa3thi Mutlaq do well in Al Anbar and other provinces?
Hayder, what is your take on the Ninevah election results?
Hey akhi Hayder I bet u r sad about the Iranian puppets SCIRI not doing so good but I know u and ur deceit... U r pretending to be happy but u r happy because u know that Maliki is also an Iranian puppet (he was with 555) and he just hides it well by shaving his beard. U Shee3a think u have us fooled but remember that the Iranians will never be able to take over the Arab world and that means SCIRI and Maliki and Ahmedinejad and you!
Omar, what do you think about:
1) Muqtada
2) Fadheela
3) Alusi
4) Allawi
5) Neo Baa3thist Mutlaq
6) Communist Part of Iraq
7) Sawha (Anbar awakening list)
8) the party that just won Ninewah
Why do you think EyeRaki supports Iran (let alone Khamenei)?
Hey Anand,
In the class when I was kid the teacher wold always say there is no such thing as a stupid question but the teacher was wrong since you just asked 9 stupid questions lol
I will tell you what I think about everyone
1) Muqtada
He is at least fighting the occupation but still he is an Iranian puppet
2) Fadheela
I do not know who he is
3) Alusi
He went to Israil so do I need to say more about this coward Zionist murderer killer
4) Allawi
At least he will not be sectarian and instead he will stand up to Iran!
5) Neo Baa3thist Mutlaq
He is good
6) Communist Part of Iraq
Where is this part of Iraq, I do not think it exists
7) Sawha (Anbar awakening list)
You spelled it wrong
8) the party that just won Ninewah
Which party is that, you tell me the name and I will say my feel of it.
Why do you think EyeRaki supports Iran (let alone Khamenei)?
OK maybe you are not good with reading English but Eye Racki’s name is Hayder al-Kheoi. Hayder is a popular name in Iran, right? It is. Khoii means from Khoy which is a city in Iran and not in Iraq or another Arab country.
Also do you know that Eye Racky is a Shee’ite so of course he is loving Iran and also Khomeyni the devil dictator.
Any other question?
Omar,
Come on man, Hayder has come out against Iran when necessary. You sound like a Saddamist, basically saying that Iraqi Shia are not "real Iraqis", the same way you are against Alusi. Saddam used a similar excuse when he burned down Karbala. I hear a lot of Baathists say that Saddam stopped an "Iranian invasion" in 1991, but they conveniently ignore the reality that Iraqis from all sects and ethnicities revolted in 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces.
You say Hayder is angry because SCIRI lost..I bet you are angry just because you saw Iraqis voting, instead of shivering with fear while watching Saddam give a nightly address to the nation.
Face it Omar, you lost. The "resistance" lost. Freedom, democracy, and Iraq itself have won.
"Any other question?"
How did you get so stupid, omar?
C.H.,
You sound like a Saddamists. Actually you dont but you sound so stupid to say this. I think you are not know what you talk about because firstly Hayder did come out against Iran but he says he is visit in Iran. This is very strange and maybe he is sit with Khomainei when he is there, what do you think?
If you are liking of Mithal Aloosi then you are in agree with him that Iran is occupying Iraq and Iran is source of problems for Iraq? I know Mithal went to Israil so I condemn it but also you know he is correct when saying Iran is controlling and ruining Iraq and Iran does this with using of Shee’a puppets!
Maybe you dont remember that Iran was attacking Iraq a lot? Or you forget because of they are paying you also?
If you think Hayder is happy SCIRI lost then you arwe wrong because I know he is not and it is what they call TAQEEYA, read it and learn about the deceition of the Iranis!
Muhannad,
That is a dumb question.
Post a Comment