Discussions to form coalitions in the provincial governments between the winners and losers are almost over. As no party won the majority they need each other in order to effectively run the provinces and watching how this plays out is somewhat fascinating.
Almost immediately after the first indications hinted at a Maliki victory the secular ex-Ba'athist Allawi who chose to stay in opposition because he couldn't stand UIA policies on many issues, including federalism, was seen cosying up with the Islamist Hakim who is still dreaming of an autonomous oil-rich south. The Sadrists, still bearing the scars from Maliki's relentless onslaught against the Mehdi Army in the Spring of 2008, have decided to be on Maliki's team.
It is precisely this weird dynamic nature of Iraqi politics, I think, that makes Iraq such an interesting subject for foreign scholars. For some Iraqis its just downright funny. The Iraqi Army, on direct orders from its Commander-in-Chief, spent three months last year fighting, and more importantly defeating, the "outlaws" (a fancy name Maliki decided to give the Sadrist Mehdi Army) in Basra, Baghdad and Amara but now the Sadrists are willing to form coalitions in the south just for the sake of seeing Hakim on the losing side. Allawi who was given harsh treatment, to put gently, by Hakim's followers has suddenly decided it would be a good thing to work with Hakim.
Perhaps these rounds of negotiations show that rivalry between the Sadrists and Hakims has previously been underestimated. It is true that the Mehdi Army has clashed with the Badr Brigade on previous occasions, most spectacularly in Kerbala when the Sadrists tried to take over the shrines, but these clashes could be seen as petty when compared to the battle, or rather war, that raged between Maliki and Sadr's Mehdi Army.
When the Mehdi Army burnt down the offices of Badr and Hakim across Iraq the Badr gunmen inside the buildings were given strict orders to evacuate and offer no resistance. The rivalry between Sadr and Hakim must now be so bitter that Sadr prefers to join Maliki, the man who destroyed the Mehdi Army, and ignore Hakim, the man who has shown restraint and caution towards the Mehdi Army.
Although the Sadrists were beaten by Hakim in some of the southern provinces they will be able to effectively marginalise SIIC once they complete the deal with Maliki. It will be back to the drawing board for Hakim and rumours are already spreading about plans to undercut the local provinces with social welfare programmes. Also the $2.4 billion allocated to the provincial authorities will need to be cleared through the Finance Ministry, which is controlled by SIIC.
Maliki and Sadr will need to be careful to make sure they do not step on SIIC's toes because no one knows what will happen if they are pushed into a corner. There is fresh talk of assassinations and newly discovered "Nejadiyat" (named after the Iranian President) IED's in Najaf and the last thing anyone, not least Maliki himself, needs is bloodshed. Although that is highly unlikely to be the work of the high ranking officials in SIIC the fear is from rogue elements in the party and disgruntled players who may not necessarily take their orders from Baghdad.
15 comments:
joining with maliki in the southern provinces may allow the sadrists to finally and fully get their sinn fein out of their IRA...so it could be a good move
All the Iranis are trying to rule Iraq and little things like this are TAQEEYA and games. In two years if the real nationist Iraqis arent stadn up then all Iraqis will command to cut there heads and Khomaeinai will be in Baghdad giving his new contry speeches in Farsi!
lolll
Lord give me strength! Wow Omar, Iran must really rule over your dreams at night. Didn't know their influence was so overbearing.
Hey anonymous, it is true that Iran will trying to rule Lebanon and Palestine and Iraq and maybe Bahrain and Dhahran! Shah Abbas
spit
isnt it kinda gay u r calling them bedfellows even tho they are all MEN? Yes, it is - gross.
I think that gay marriage is illegal in Iraq tho the Sadrists were wanting to legal it!
Eye raki,
Reading this post makes me wonder if the new religious craze (not religion itself) may have played a part in the deteroriation of women's rights in iraq.
Unfortunatley what i have seen in Diyala was that women actively took a role in keeping their treatment the same. Iraqi women are respected and do have power, but it seems many of them are still too dependent on tradition and bedou lifestlye.
But the young generation. i.e my age are something different..a lot of people are saying its the brain drain but i doubt it. That's how much tv and the internet has affected iraqi adolescents, but i always think we should cut them some slack after the lives they have led so far.
Touta you are right about them having power, Iraqi men hate to admit it but many are actually afraid of their wives and they even joke about it in private circles but of course this doesn't mean the situation there is perfect but like I said time permitting many things will change inshallah
Very true, and Inshallah it will be better..reminded me of a joke i recently heard:
a man and his wife were arguing so he threw her out of the window..(!), below, a drunk man kissed her. She kissed him back. The drunk man looked up and proclaimed "ghareeb,heeya leehisa tishtughul fa laeesh thaboha?". :D
Coincidentally, more shops have started selling alcohol too, so its quite an apt joke for the current situation.
You are a hypocrite for having a iPhone
SHOULD I OPEN A BLOG?
I think it would be better then this one.
Interesting piece. I agree that Maliki should avoid a confrontation with Hakim if he can avoid it.
Omar, you should open a blog. It is better not to have so many Iranian blobs which are trying to control Iraq.
Everyone has said that Haidar is a corrupt Iranian who is having fancy watches and matching fancy glasses and expensive cigarette lighters and rings and hats, and cars (Ferari + Asten Martin) and a iPhone (with lots of apps).
anti-irani, why are you so interested in attacking Iran? Could it be because secretly you work for Khamenei. Maybe Khamenei feels threatened by the Khoeis?
hey anand, Ruhollah Khomeini died like 50 years ago, it shows u know nothing about Iran and Iraq LOL
Othman, the third rightly guided Caliph, can be both a sunni or a Shia name. One of the most capable Lt. Generals in the Iraqi Army is named Othman. He is highly nonsectarian although nominally Shia.
You appear nothing like this other Othman. You seem sectarian.
Supreme Leader Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini, may peace be upon him, died on on June 3rd, 1989.
I was referring to his successor Supreme Leader Sayyed Ali Hoseyni Khāmene’i, may peace be upon him.
Post a Comment